<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[arbitration and california supreme court Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration+and+california+supreme+court.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to arbitration and california supreme court]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Weighs In On Employment Arbitration Agreements That Prohibit Class Actions, The]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5293/is_200709/ai_n21263512]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[While the official policy of the state of California is to encourage arbitrations as a way of efficiently resolving conflicts, California courts continue to revisit and closely scrutinize employment-related arbitration agreements. On August 30, 2007, the California Supreme Court again weighed in on the issue of employment-related arbitration agreements in...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration.html"><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/class+action.html"><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Calif. court rules arbitration can't stop class-actions.(News)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb4962/is_200507/ai_n18146728]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Byline: JEFFREY SILVA      The California Supreme Court last week ruled arbitration agreements  between companies and customers do not necessarily preclude people from  filing class-action suits, a decision with unclear implications for the  state's mobile-phone carriers with mandatory arbitration clauses in  service...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration.html"><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/wireless.html"><![CDATA[WIRELESS]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Cooley Godward team helps consumer health group win two major court cases]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5247/is_19_24/ai_n29002040]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Representing Clients: Thanks to a team of lawyers at Cooley Godward LLP, a California consumer health organization won two big court cases recently - one in the U.S. Supreme Court and the other in the California Supreme Court.  William Grauer, the chair of Cooley Godward's San Diego litigation department,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration.html"><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/pacificare+health+systems+inc..html"><![CDATA[PacifiCare Health Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/team.html"><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Approves Mandatory Arbitration Agreements]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5247/is_40_21/ai_n28796754]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court on August 24, 2000 issued an important ruling approving the concept of mandatory, employer-imposed arbitration agreements for resolution of employment disputes. The Court required that such agreements be bilateral (i.e., both the employer and the employee must be bound to arbitrate claims); required that the employer...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2000 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/agreement.html"><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration.html"><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
