<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[attorney and california supreme court Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney+and+california+supreme+court.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to attorney and california supreme court]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="7" found="7" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court decision opens new avenue for sexual harassment lawsuits.(News)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_200507/ai_n20158770]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Byline: ROBERTO CENICEROS    SAN FRANCISCO-Employers in California face new employment practices  liabilities arising from sexual affair-linked favoritism by managers,  following a ruling by the state's Supreme Court last week.    In a unanimous decision, California's high court ruled that  employees can sue...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/harassment.html"><![CDATA[Harassment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/lawsuit.html"><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/miller.html"><![CDATA[Miller]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/workplace.html"><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Orloff Case: California Supreme Court Holds that Public Enforcement Agencies Can Bring Action Against CPUC-Regulated Entities. ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1494/is_200401/ai_n6634232]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Morrison & Foerster has been monitoring developments in a case recently decided by the California Supreme Court which may have important consequences for companies seeking judicial relief against public utilities regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC"). Public Utilities Code Section 1759 provides that no California court, except the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/agency.html"><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Sea Scout case goes to high court]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20030327/ai_n14544863]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Berkeley's refusal to provide a free municipal marina berth to a group connected to the Boy Scouts of America, which doesn't allow gay members or leaders, will be reviewed by the California Supreme Court.   The state's highest court decided Wednesday to hear the appeal of the Berkeley Sea...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/america.html"><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/leadership.html"><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[State Bar Court Recommends Disbarment of Immigration Attorney]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2002_Sept_4/ai_91059799]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[News Editors and Government/Legal Writers  SAN FRANCISCO--BUSINESS WIRE--Sept. 4, 2002  The State Bar Court Review Department has affirmed a recommendation that San Francisco immigration attorney Miguel Gadda (#64832) be disbarred from the practice of law for multiple acts of misconduct, including five instances in which his clients were...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2002 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Court TV's Legal Questions Column.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_199903/ai_n22392172]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News    Mar. 22 -- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON LEGAL ISSUES:  The information  provided is general in nature; consult with an attorney or legal expert  for specific advice on your case.    QUESTION: If two unmarried people who lived together...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/agreement.html"><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Lawyers differ on effect of whistleblower ruling]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199809/ai_n20144248]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[JUDY GREENWALD  SAN FRANCISCO - A California Supreme Court ruling that gives  whistleblowers greater leeway to sue their former employers for wrongful  termination will lead to more lawsuits, say some attorneys.  But other attorneys contend the decision in Richard Green vs.  Ralee-Engineering Co. is narrow...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1998 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulation.html"><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Lawyers differ on effect of whistleblower ruling.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199809/ai_n20144633]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO - A California Supreme Court ruling that gives  whistleblowers greater leeway to sue their former employers for wrongful  termination will lead to more lawsuits, say some attorneys.  But other attorneys contend the decision in Richard Green vs.  Ralee-Engineering Co. is narrow and not a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1998 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
