<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[benefits and california supreme court Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits+and+california+supreme+court.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to benefits and california supreme court]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="12" found="12" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Trademark infringement, discretionary bonus plans: corporate officer has no wage-hour exposure]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb274/is_11_13/ai_n29440980]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: We recently discovered that a company secured a web page using the trademarked name of a division of our company. They appear to be taking advertising revenue from our competitors and displaying it on the site. Beyond that, they are not selling any goods or services. Although the site...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/internet.html"><![CDATA[INTERNET]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/salary.html"><![CDATA[salary]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+department+of+labor.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Gay couples &#39;ecstatic&#39; over ruling]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmusa/is_200805/ai_n25440130]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO -- Lauren Patton was still in shock Thursday four hours after her neighbor woke her up, unable to withhold the news any longer: The California Supreme Court made its historic decision, and same-sex marriage was legal.     "I almost can't believe it," said Patton, 24,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court hears gay marriage case]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmafp/is_200803/ai_n24365885]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO AFP &#8212; California's highest court heard arguments Tuesday from supporters and opponents of gay marriage in a case which could decide the legality of such unions in the largest US state.  The California Supreme Court in San Francisco was addressing the constitutionality of the short but controversial...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Employers awaiting a major wage and hours court decision.(BUSINESS LAW)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5963/is_200712/ai_n24100931]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers are awaiting a major wage and hours court decision that  could revoke the exempt status of thousands of employees. The California  Supreme Court has agreed to consider an appeal by insurers, who argue  that claims adjusters are exempt from overtime because they do  administrative tasks....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/insurance.html"><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/salary.html"><![CDATA[salary]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[State to Pay CalSTRS Interest on Withheld $500M Payment]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_Nov_15/ai_n27448860]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Upholds CalSTRS' Call for State to Pay $200 Million in Interest  SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The California Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court decision awarding California State Teachers' Retirement System's CalSTRS $200 million in interest payments, on $500 million withheld by the state in...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/payment.html"><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/teacher.html"><![CDATA[teacher]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[IN THE CAPITAL]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3944/is_200411/ai_n9464601]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[High Court Agrees To Hear Commandments, Prisoner casesThe U.S. Supreme Court has decided to review three cases raising important religious liberty issues.On Oct. 12, the justices accepted two lawsuits dealing with government display of the Ten Commandments and a third case challenging a federal law that requires prisons to respect...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/church.html"><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Maryland Catholics Hear Birth Control Ruling Won't Apply.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200403/ai_n22126294]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[By Marguerite Higgins, The Washington Times Knight Ridder/Tribune  Business News    Mar. 3--Roman Catholic organizations in Maryland will not be forced  to  provide health insurance that covers contraceptives in the wake of a   California Supreme Court ruling because Maryland law has broader ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/church.html"><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/insurance.html"><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/maryland.html"><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Must Defend Catholics' Civil Rights, Not Abridge Them Says American Life League]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5554/is_200312/ai_n21828289]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, Dec. 1 /U.S. Newswire/ -- American Life League president Judie Brown issued the following statement regarding Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. State of California: "The question before the California Supreme Court is simple: Will the civil rights of Catholics in California be protected by that state's Supreme Court?...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California High Court Won't Hear State Teachers' Retirement System Suit.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200307/ai_n22466519]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[By Gilbert Chan, The Sacramento Bee, Calif. Knight Ridder/Tribune  Business News    Jul. 31--The California Supreme Court declined Wednesday to hear a   lawsuit attempting to force the state to restore a $500 million benefit   payment to the California State Teachers' Retirement System. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2003 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/teacher.html"><![CDATA[teacher]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[`Hotel conversion fee' valid, California court rules. (Exactions).(California Supreme Court )]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5632/is_200207/ai_n23651688]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A fee imposed as a condition of permitting conversion of a  residential hotel to a tourist hotel was not an unconstitutional taking  of the hotel owners' property without just compensation, the  California Supreme Court has ruled (San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City and  County of San...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/compensation.html"><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/permit.html"><![CDATA[permit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Santa Ana ordinance upheld.(A Santa Ana, California, law prohibiting camping and the storage of personal property in public places is upheld by the California Supreme Court)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6639/is_199505/ai_n26540309]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On a 6-1 vote, the California Supreme Court ruled that a strict Santa  Ana law barring camping and the storing of personal property in public  areas does not violate the constitutional rights of homeless people.  The case was the first of its kind to reach a state...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1995 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/storage.html"><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[How Do Third-Party, Bad Faith Bodily Injury Claims Affect Automobile Insurance Costs and Compensation]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=111134]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In its 1979 decision in Royal Globe Insurance Company v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court gave an accident victim the right to bring a claim for punitive damages against another person's liability insurer if the victim felt that the insurer had engaged in unfair claims settlement practices. Although the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[White papers]]></s:doctype>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/compensation.html"><![CDATA[Compensation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/ingersoll-rand.html"><![CDATA[Ingersoll-Rand]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/accident.html"><![CDATA[Accident]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/insurance.html"><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/policies+and+procedures.html"><![CDATA[Policies And Procedures]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/financial+planning.html"><![CDATA[Financial Planning]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/business+operations.html"><![CDATA[Business Operations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/corporate+insurance.html"><![CDATA[Corporate Insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/human+resources.html"><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IR</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IR</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
