<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[california supreme court and class action Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court+and+class+action.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to california supreme court and class action]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Weighs In On Employment Arbitration Agreements That Prohibit Class Actions, The]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5293/is_200709/ai_n21263512]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[While the official policy of the state of California is to encourage arbitrations as a way of efficiently resolving conflicts, California courts continue to revisit and closely scrutinize employment-related arbitration agreements. On August 30, 2007, the California Supreme Court again weighed in on the issue of employment-related arbitration agreements in...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration.html"><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/class+action.html"><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Employment Law Commentary, November 2004 - California Supreme Court Embraces Wage/Hour Class Actions. ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1494/is_200412/ai_n9737250]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In August, the California Supreme Court decided a much anticipated case expected to clarify the requirements for certifying wage and hour class actions.  Its decision in Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Sup. Ct., 34 Cal. 4th 319 (2004), initially delighted the      In August, the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/class+action.html"><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court Declines to Hold Back The Tide of Overtime Class Actions. ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1494/is_200409/ai_n6460944]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 26, 2004, the California Supreme Court released its eagerly awaited opinion in Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior Court, -- Cal.4th --, 2004 WL 1902370 (2004). For several years now, California has been the battleground over a uniquely c      On August 26, 2004,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/class+action.html"><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Court clears class action; Legal merit not required for certification.(California Supreme Court)(Brief Article)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_200007/ai_n20174356]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO -- A recent California Supreme Court decision that  says the legal merits of a case should not be a factor in deciding  whether to certify it as a class action will allow more class-action  suits to proceed against businesses, some attorne  SAN FRANCISCO --...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2000 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/class+action.html"><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Allows Class-Action Suits to Proceed.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_199901/ai_n22383681]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News    Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News  ]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 1999 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/class+action.html"><![CDATA[class action]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
