Resources
BNET Resources
- sort by:
- Relevance
- Date
- Popularity
- EPLI may cover many wage/hour suits. (Policyholder Lawyers' Perspective).(employee practices liability insurance)
- During the last two years, a substantial number of wage/hour class action lawsuits have been filed by employees against their employers seeking to recover damages and other relief for the nonpayment of overtime wages. While some employers assume t During the last two...
- Research articles 2003-02-10
- Insurers dodge a bullet. (California Supreme Court ruling on Industrial Indemnity Co. advertising liability responsibility) (California & the Western States) (Editorial)
- "No one knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men, but it's all insured." This reported quote by the California Supreme Court's Chief Justice Malcolm Lucas aptly and concisely sums up the frightening tendency of courts to see insurance "No one...
- Research articles 1992-09-07
- Insurers not obligated to defend orders: court. (California Supreme Court rules that insurers are not obligated to defend policyholders from cleanups ordered by government)
- LOS ANGELES - Insurers do not have a duty to defend policyholders against government-ordered environmental cleanups, the California Supreme Court has ruled. In a 4-3 decision, the court ruled that insurers must defend commercial general liability poliLOS ANGELES - Insurers do not have a duty to...
- Research articles 1998-08-10
- CGL ruling saves insurers billions. (California Supreme Court decision on the suit against Industrial Indemnity Co. for commercial general liability coverage of advertising injury claims)
- The California Supreme Court has reversed a lower court decision which had insurers facing billions of dollars in claims for securities and bank fraud, antitrust activities and patent infringement. The high court ruled that the commercial general l The California Supreme Court has reversed...
- Research articles 1992-08-10
- Court rules on bad faith claims.
- Court Rules On Bad Faith Claims State Farm Ready To Appeal Calif. Court Reversal The door to third-party bad-faith lawsuits against California insurers, slammed shut a year ago when the California Supreme Court overturned the Royal-Globe decisiCourt Rules On...
- Research articles 1989-09-25
- Prop. 103 decision called industry boon.
- Prop. 103 Decision Called Industry Boon ANNANDALE, Va.--The California Supreme Court decision on Proposition 103 was a smashing victory for the insurance industry, an insurance industry scholar said recently. "The decision discredits simple-Prop. 103 Decision Called Industry Boon ...
- Research articles 1989-06-12
- Court puts limits on cleanup cover; Indemnity under CGL policy at issue.(Statistical Data Included)
- SAN FRANCISCO--A California Supreme Court ruling could increase litigation as policyholders find court-ordered damages against them are now a prerequisite for obtaining pollution cleanup coverage under commercial general liability policies, policyhol SAN FRANCISCO--A California Supreme Court ruling could increase litigation as policyholders find court-ordered damages...
- Research articles 2001-02-12
- Calif. court rules on CGL cover. (California Supreme Court; commercial general liability policyholders)
- The California Supreme Court handed commercial general liability policyholders another victory over insurers late last month in a complicated ruling requiring insurers to pay for pollution site investigation costs as defense costs. In Aerojet-Ge The California Supreme Court handed commercial general...
- Research articles 1998-01-12
- California Supreme Court Issues Ruling With Broad Implications For Property Insurers
- This article discusses issues ruling with broad implications for property insurers. An insurer that denies a claim on the ground that it does not exceed the deductible may be stopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense. The decision is potentially significant in a number of respects. The...
- White papers 2001-12-01
- Calif. court eyes insurer tax. (California Supreme Court)
- Calif. Court Eyes Insurer Tax The California Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether insurance companies are subject to state and local taxes on their investments despite a provision in the state constitution which appears to grant an exemption.Calif. Court Eyes Insurer...
- Research articles 1989-04-10
- Paying part of legal tab: policyholder required to repay part of defense costs: Court. (California Supreme Court)
- LOS ANGELES - In a potentially costly defeat for policyholders facing liability lawsuits, the California Supreme Court has ruled that general liability insurers' duty to defend policyholders does not mean insurers are responsible for the entire defenseLOS ANGELES - In a potentially costly defeat for policyholders facing...
- Research articles 1997-08-04
- State to review awards. (California Supreme Court's review of an insurance bad faith case)
- Punitive award at issue in bad faith case SAN FRANCISCO - California courts may receive some long-awaited guidance on punitive damages when the state Supreme Court reviews an insurance bad faith case. The eventual decision in West American Insurance CPunitive award at issue in bad faith...
- Research articles 1996-01-29
Additional Resources
- How Do Third-Party, Bad Faith Bodily Injury Claims Affect Automobile Insurance Costs and Compensation
- In its 1979 decision in Royal Globe Insurance Company v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court gave an accident victim the right to bring a claim for punitive damages against another person's liability insurer if the victim felt that the insurer had engaged in unfair claims settlement practices. Although the...
- White papers
- RemedyTemp to Challenge State Appeal Court Decision in Workers' Compensation Case
- ALISO VIEJO, Calif. -- RemedyTemp, Inc. (Nasdaq:REMX), which operates as Remedy Intelligent StaffingR and RemXR Specialty Staffing, today said it will ask the California Supreme Court to review the ruling by a California Court of Appeal panel that the insurers that covered RemedyTemp's client firms, and not the California Insurance...
- Research articles 2004-10-21
- Insurer consent is required for coverage to transfer in acquisition: California court.(News)(decision in Henkel Corp. vs Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. )
- Byline: ROBERTO CENICEROS SAN FRANCISCO-To transfer insurance coverage in a merger or acquisition may require insurer consent and does not automatically occur in the exchange of assets and liabilities, California's Supreme Court has ruled. The Feb. 3 decision in Henkel Corp....
- Research articles 2003-02-10
- << Previous
- page 1 of 1
- Next >>
Presented by the Premiere Rewards Gold Card from American Express