<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[california supreme court and litigation Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court+and+litigation.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to california supreme court and litigation]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="7" found="7" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court decision favors Stem Cell Research Institute]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5247/is_21_28/ai_n29352619]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal challenging the constitutionality of the state's institute for embryonic stem cell research May 16.  The decision ends the three-year legal battle that has blocked the San Francisco-based California Institute for Regenerative Medicine from granting voter-approved money for such research. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/stem-cell.html"><![CDATA[stem-cell]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California High Court Backs Utility Deal.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200308/ai_n21571359]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[By Claire Cooper, The Sacramento Bee, Calif. Knight Ridder/Tribune  Business News    Aug. 22--SAN FRANCISCO--The California Supreme Court on Thursday  upheld a  state commission's power to bail out a utility and shift  onto ratepayers $3  billion in costs for the 2000-01 energy crisis....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/commission.html"><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/edison.html"><![CDATA[Edison]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/financial.html"><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sales.html"><![CDATA[SALES]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Cooley Godward team helps consumer health group win two major court cases]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5247/is_19_24/ai_n29002040]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Representing Clients: Thanks to a team of lawyers at Cooley Godward LLP, a California consumer health organization won two big court cases recently - one in the U.S. Supreme Court and the other in the California Supreme Court.  William Grauer, the chair of Cooley Godward's San Diego litigation department,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2003 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/arbitration.html"><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/pacificare+health+systems+inc..html"><![CDATA[PacifiCare Health Systems Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/team.html"><![CDATA[team]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The California Supreme Court Recognizes Holdings Claims for Securities Actions]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/abstract.aspx?docid=67337]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 7, 2003, the California Supreme Court, held that California law authorizes a shareholder who is wrongfully induced to hold stock instead of selling it to bring a common law action for fraud or misrepresentation, if the shareholder can make a bona fide showing of actual reliance upon misrepresentations....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[White papers]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/misrepresentation.html"><![CDATA[Misrepresentation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/stock.html"><![CDATA[Stock]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/thelen+reid+%2526+priest.html"><![CDATA[Thelen Reid & Priest]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/investment.html"><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/business+operations.html"><![CDATA[Business Operations]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[South Coast district expected to revive voided VOC limits. (Industry News).]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5968/is_200212/ai_n24115146]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON -- The California Supreme Court recently upheld an  appeals-court decision that voided stringent new VOC limits on  architectural and industrial maintenance coatings imposed by the South  Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD.    The action affirms the appellate court's ruling that the  SCAQMD...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Adopts "Economic Loss" Limitationon Defective Construction Claims, as Does Nevada Supreme Court]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6645/is_3_68/ai_n28879608]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Aas v. Superior Court, 12 P.3d 1125, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 718 (Cal. 2000).  Calloway v. City of Reno, 993 P.2d 1259 (Nev. 2000).  One theory of the law is that, for every wrong done, there should be a remedy. The notion is largely but not completely accepted...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2001 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/construction.html"><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Letters.(Letter to the Editor)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3374/is_200101/ai_n8111898]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA["Runaway litigation must stop somewhere. This decision is a  great start."      Court Decision a Win for CA Builders      The Aas v. Superior Court decision is a good one because builders  in California might start building condos again. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
