<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[california supreme court and regulations Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court+and+regulations.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to california supreme court and regulations]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="5" found="5" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[CA court holds Oakland predatory lending ordinance invalid]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5246/is_6_65/ai_n29170437]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ON JAN. 31, 2005, THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME Court invalidated the city of Oakland's antipredatory lending ordinance, ruling that the ordinance (Ord. No. 12361 CMS), is pre-empted by the California covered-loan statute enacted in 2001.  The court concluded that in enacting statutory restrictions on "covered loans," the California Legislature has,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/computer+associates+international+inc..html"><![CDATA[Computer Associates International Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/mortgage.html"><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/mortgages.html"><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/oakland.html"><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulation.html"><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FTCR: FERC Admits Energy Ripoff but Davis Wants Consumers to Pay; Davis Should Reverse Support for Utility Bailouts]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5554/is_200303/ai_n21817301]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SANTA MONICA, Calif., March 26 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Now that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has acknowledged that energy companies created the electricity crisis in 2001, Governor Davis should stop insisting that ratepayers pay the $45 billion cost of the crisis, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights FTCR said...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/governor.html"><![CDATA[Governor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Lawyers differ on effect of whistleblower ruling]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199809/ai_n20144248]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[JUDY GREENWALD  SAN FRANCISCO - A California Supreme Court ruling that gives  whistleblowers greater leeway to sue their former employers for wrongful  termination will lead to more lawsuits, say some attorneys.  But other attorneys contend the decision in Richard Green vs.  Ralee-Engineering Co. is narrow...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1998 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulation.html"><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Lawyers differ on effect of whistleblower ruling.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199809/ai_n20144633]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN FRANCISCO - A California Supreme Court ruling that gives  whistleblowers greater leeway to sue their former employers for wrongful  termination will lead to more lawsuits, say some attorneys.  But other attorneys contend the decision in Richard Green vs.  Ralee-Engineering Co. is narrow and not a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1998 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Calif. insurers win suit over ERISA preemption. (Employee Retirement Income Security Act)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5557/is_198901/ai_n21989978]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Calif. Insurers Win Suit Over ERISA Preemption    Insurers have won another round in their battle to establish that  state unfair claims practices laws and the punitive damage suits they  spawn are preempted by ERISA.    The California Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that workers...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1989 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/erisa.html"><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
