<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[california supreme court and women Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court+and+women.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to california supreme court and women]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California Supreme Court broadens sexual harassment]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb274/is_16_10/ai_n29204360]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 18, 2005, the California Supreme Court ruled that favoritism in the workplace might constitute unlawful sexual harassment in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, otherwise known as FEHA.  Two former employees of the Valley State Prison for Women, Edna Miller and Frances Mackey, filed a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/conduct.html"><![CDATA[conduct]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/harassment.html"><![CDATA[Harassment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/supervisor.html"><![CDATA[supervisor]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/women.html"><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/workplace.html"><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Two blocked court nominees differ in styles]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmusa/is_200505/ai_n14736537]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON -- They are prominent faces in the Senate fight over President Bush's judicial nominations. Both are women and both are conservative. But Priscilla Owen and Janice Rogers Brown have come to the national stage with strikingly different backgrounds and legal styles.  Owen, a Texas Supreme Court justice, is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/bush.html"><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/texas.html"><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+senate.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/women.html"><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Christian Coalition President Roberta Combs Tells Democrats: 'Stop Discriminating Against Successful Women']]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5554/is_200504/ai_n21854519]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, April 27 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Roberta Combs, president of the Christian Coalition of America said, "It is time for Democrats to end their unconstitutional filibuster of highly qualified women judicial nominees.  It is pure discrimination when a highly successful African-American Justice on the California Supreme Court, Janice Rogers...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/america.html"><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/democrat.html"><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/nominee.html"><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/president.html"><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+senate.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/women.html"><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Catholics for a Free Choice Applauds California Supreme Court's Decision to Uphold Women's Access to Contraceptive Services]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5554/is_200403/ai_n21829234]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON, March 1 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Catholics for a Free Choice CFFC welcomes today's ruling in the California case Catholic Charities vs. Superior Court as an important step in acknowledging women's right to equal access to the health care services WASHINGTON, March 1 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Catholics for a Free...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california+supreme+court.html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/health+care.html"><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/microsoft+access.html"><![CDATA[Microsoft Access]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/women.html"><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
