<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[conduct and punitive damage Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/conduct+and+punitive+damage.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to conduct and punitive damage]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[TOBACCO RULING.(News)(Brief article)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_200702/ai_n20165014]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Main points in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Philip Morris USA  vs. Mayola Williams:    At issue    1. Whether in reviewing a jury's award of punitive damages, an  appellate court's conclusion that a defendant's conduct was  highly reprehensible and  ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/conduct.html"><![CDATA[conduct]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/philip+morris+usa.html"><![CDATA[Philip Morris USA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/punitive+damage.html"><![CDATA[punitive damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/tobacco.html"><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[High court considers punitives.(Philip Morris USA vs. Mayola Williams)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_200611/ai_n20165524]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Byline: MARK A. HOFMANN    WASHINGTON-The Supreme Court may use a tobacco liability case to  determine whether due process guarantees allow a jury to levy punitive  damages on a defendant for the effects of its conduct on people who are  not a party to ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/conduct.html"><![CDATA[conduct]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/philip+morris+usa.html"><![CDATA[Philip Morris USA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/punitive+damage.html"><![CDATA[punitive damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/state+farm+mutual+automobile+insurance+co..html"><![CDATA[State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[California damages reversed; 9th Circuit bars jury's consideration of national acts.(News)(Court of Appeals case involving Ford Motor Co. has statewide vs national ramifications)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_200212/ai_n20153581]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Byline: ROBERTO CENICEROS    SAN FRANCISCO-Punitive damage awards for wrongs committed in one  state must apply only to those particular actions, rather than address  nationwide conduct, a federal appeals court has ruled.    In Ginny V. White vs. Ford M  Byline: ROBERTO CENICEROS...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2002 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/conduct.html"><![CDATA[conduct]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/ford+motor+co..html"><![CDATA[Ford Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/punitive+damage.html"><![CDATA[punitive damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">F</category>
		<category domain="tickers">F</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
