<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[fax.com Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.com.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to fax.com]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FCC orders $5.3 million penalty for junk faxes]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4180/is_20040205/ai_n10069323]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission imposed a $5,379,000 fine against Fax.com, Inc., a California-based company, for 489 separate violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 USC Section  227b(1)C, and FCC regulations. This is the largest single fine imposed to date under the TCPA.   Fax.com operates a fax...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.html"><![CDATA[Fax]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.com.html"><![CDATA[Fax.com]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FCC Makes Example of Orange County, Calif.'s Fax.com.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200401/ai_n22092520]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Orange County Register, Calif. Knight Ridder/Tribune Business  News    Jan. 6--Federal regulators slapped Orange County telemarketer  Fax.com  with a record $5.4 million fine as part of a crackdown on  unwanted telephone  solicitations, including junk faxes.    Even though Federal Communications...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.html"><![CDATA[Fax]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.com.html"><![CDATA[Fax.com]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/orange+pcs.html"><![CDATA[Orange PCS]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[FCC Wallops Aliso Viejo, Calif., Firm with Fines for Unsolicited Fax Ads.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200401/ai_n22092608]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[By Tony Pugh, Knight Ridder Washington Bureau Knight Ridder/Tribune  Business News    Jan. 6--WASHINGTON--In the largest penalty ever imposed for  unwanted  telephone solicitations, the Federal Communications Commission  on Monday fined  a California fax company nearly $5.4 million for  transmitting such ads. ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/advertisement.html"><![CDATA[advertisement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.html"><![CDATA[Fax]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.com.html"><![CDATA[Fax.com]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/phone.html"><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Ban on Junk Faxes Sought in California.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200208/ai_n21655044]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[By Bernard J. Wolfson, The Orange County Register, Calif. Knight  Ridder/Tribune Business News    Aug. 8--A pair of state legislators Wednesday jumped on news of a  federal  fine against Aliso Viejo-based Fax.com to resurrect a bill  cracking down on  junk faxes in California....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/california.html"><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.html"><![CDATA[Fax]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fax.com.html"><![CDATA[Fax.com]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fcc.html"><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
