<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[general motors corp. and punitive damage Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/general+motors+corp.+and+punitive+damage.html?i=2]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to general motors corp. and punitive damage]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="3" found="3" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PUNITIVE DAMAGES OPINION IS `IMMORAL'.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199908/ai_n20167416]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[To the editor: This is in response to the July 19 editorial, ``Put  Brake on Punitive Awards,'' regarding the huge jury award  against General Motors Corp. Because the article is listed under  ``Opinion'' I respect the author's right to his or her  opin  To the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/general+motors+corp..html"><![CDATA[General Motors Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/punitive+damage.html"><![CDATA[punitive damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GMGMQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GMGMQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[PUT BRAKE ON PUNITIVE AWARDS.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199907/ai_n20161583]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A California jury's decision to order General Motors Corp. to  pay $4.8 billion in punitive damages in a personal injury case  demonstrates once again the glaring need for punitive damages reform in  this country.     Not only did this Los Angeles jury  ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/general+motors+corp..html"><![CDATA[General Motors Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/punitive+damage.html"><![CDATA[punitive damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GMGMQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GMGMQ</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[NEW TORT REFORM PUSH UNLIKELY: GM VERDICT NOT SEEN AS CATALYST.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_199907/ai_n20168314]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite its huge size, this month's $4.9 billion verdict  against Detroit-based General Motors Corp. won't greatly influence  tort reform in California or in other states, legal experts predict.     Experts say a verdict against Dearborn, Mich.-based Fo  Despite its huge size, this month's $4.9...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/cisco+catalyst.html"><![CDATA[Cisco Catalyst]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/general+motors+corp..html"><![CDATA[General Motors Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/punitive+damage.html"><![CDATA[punitive damage]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/tort.html"><![CDATA[tort]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/verdict.html"><![CDATA[verdict]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GMGMQ</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GMGMQ</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
