<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[medical institution Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/medical+institution.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to medical institution]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Insurers Take On Botched Medical Work -- With Their Checkbooks]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.bnet.com/5208-13112-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=2083&messageID=9424&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Insurers Take On Botched Medical Work -- With Their CheckbooksWhat a Novel Idea....Novel idea, not paying for defective products/services. I'm wondering if they'll also bar doctors and hospitals from billing the patients for botched work when the insurance doesn't pay.  My guess is that its going to be double...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 08:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/dedicated+professional.html"><![CDATA[dedicated professional]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/human+error.html"><![CDATA[human error]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/insurance+company.html"><![CDATA[insurance company]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/medical+institution.html"><![CDATA[medical institution]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patient.html"><![CDATA[patient]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/team.html"><![CDATA[team]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
