<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[patent litigation and u.s. patent and trademark office Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent+litigation+and+u.s.+patent++and++trademark+office.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to patent litigation and u.s. patent and trademark office]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="4" found="4" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The United States Patent and Trademark Office Orders the Re-Examination of Two Patents Included in the Patent Litigation between Illumina and Affymetrix]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_Dec_21/ai_n27481740]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN DIEGO -- Illumina, Inc. (NASDAQ:ILMN) announced today that the United States Patent and Trademark office has ordered the re-examination of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,355,432 and 6,646,243. The serial numbers for the re-examinations are 90/008,885 and 90/008,889, respectively. They were assigned the same filing date of November 27, 2007. The...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent+litigation.html"><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+patent+and+trademark+office.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The United States Patent and Trademark Office Orders The Re-Examination of Two Additional Patents Included in the Patent Litigation Between Illumina and Affymetrix]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_Dec_21/ai_n27482205]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[SAN DIEGO -- Illumina, Inc. (NASDAQ:ILMN) announced today that the United States Patent and Trademark office has ordered the re-examination of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,545,531 and 5,795,716. The serial numbers for the re-examinations are 90/008,888 and 90/008,886, respectively. They were assigned the same filing date of November 27, 2007. The...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent+litigation.html"><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+patent+and+trademark+office.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[<i>Inter Partes</I> Reexamination: The USPTO Alternative To Patent Litigation. ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1494/is_200309/ai_n9219270]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Crippled in its reach, shunned for express estoppel provisions, and written out of the USPTO's 21st Century Plan, the inter partes reexamination procedure has had a troubled start. Nonetheless, inter partes reexamination remains a significant strate      Crippled in its reach, shunned for express estoppel provisions,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent+litigation.html"><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+patent+and+trademark+office.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office finalizes rejection of central claim in Vitronics vs. Conceptronic patent litigation]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1995_April_5/ai_16766762]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[PORTSMOUTH, N.H.--BUSINESS WIRE--April 5, 1995--Conceptronic Inc. (NASDAQ: CNCP) announced today that it received notification yesterday from the United States Patent and Trademark Office that claim No. 1 of Vitronics apparatus patent No. 4,833,301 had been rejected after an appeal by Vitronics Corp.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent+litigation.html"><![CDATA[patent litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+patent+and+trademark+office.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Patent and Trademark Office]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
