<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[pr department Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/pr+department.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to pr department]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="1" found="1" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Best Practices of PR Departments]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.bnet.com/5208-13543-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=2478&messageID=11574&start=0]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Best Practices of PR DepartmentsSo-called best practicesJon, thanks for summarizing these "best practices," but this list is kind of soft.  What makes something a best practice---can practitioners really vote on this, or should best practices be empirically proven by some kind of objective observations and measurements?  My second...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Discussion threads]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:42:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/best+practice.html"><![CDATA[best practice]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/pr+department.html"><![CDATA[PR Department]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/public+relations.html"><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
