<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[statute Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to statute]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="20" found="892" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legal Opinions - U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals: October 14, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20081014/ai_n30901911]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Administrative Law   Medicaid funding regulations    BOTTOM LINE: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services did not exceed its authority in promulgating regulations for state to follow in calculating post-eligibility income of nursing home residents.   CASE: Md. Dep't. of Health and Mental Hygiene v. Centers...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/deduction.html"><![CDATA[deduction]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/income.html"><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/maryland.html"><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/medicaid.html"><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulation.html"><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+circuit+court.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Hazards for Habeas Corpus: justice demands that an accused criminal be given the right of "habeas corpus," the ability to challenge the legality of his detention, but this right is being steadily eroded]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JZS/is_21_24/ai_n30914334]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Rogue public officials consolidating a police state dispatch jackbooted thugs to arrest dissidents. Their victims defend themselves with firearms. Those who are captured are branded "enemy combatants," and held indefinitely, incommunicado, without any specific charges brought against them, with no access to an attorney or hope of a fair trial....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/quality.html"><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/suspension.html"><![CDATA[suspension]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s..html"><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Maryland Court of Appeals says state lawsuit can come after federal]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20081010/ai_n30901776]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The state's highest court has revived a former physician's lawsuit against Montgomery County over the treatment she received during her arrest and detention more than eight years ago.   Reversing two lower-court decisions, the Court of Appeals found that Sherri A. Turner's lawsuit in state court was timely when...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/lawsuit.html"><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+district+court.html"><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legal Opinions - Maryland Court of Appeals: September 29, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20080929/ai_n28112530]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Contracts   Cause for termination   BOTTOM LINE: Dealer agreements executed prior to enactment of CL [section]19-103 were, in effect, renewed following the enactment of the statute; therefore, the statute applied prospectively to prohibit manufacturer from terminating agreements without cause.   CASE: John Deere Construction and Forestry...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/counsel.html"><![CDATA[Counsel]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/enactment.html"><![CDATA[enactment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/maryland.html"><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/oath.html"><![CDATA[oath]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/state+farm+mutual+automobile+insurance+co..html"><![CDATA[State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/termination.html"><![CDATA[termination]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Environmental laws; major statutes administered by the Environmental Protection Agency]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0QLQ/is_2008_August/ai_n28046157]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmental laws; major statutes administered by the Environmental Protection Agency EPA.  Ed. by Susan R. Fletcher et al.  Nova Science Publishers  2008  120 pages  $69.00  Hardcover  KF3775  This recent entry from Nova Science Publishers serves to provide a summary of laws and...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+environmental+protection+agency.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mileage rate increased]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ICC/is_2_77/ai_n30928242]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to rising gas prices, the mileage rate will increase by eight cents to 58.5 cents a mile for all business miles driven from July 1 through Dec. 31, 2008. The new rate for computing deductible medical or moving expenses also will increase by eight cents to 27 cents a...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/computing.html"><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/internal+revenue+service.html"><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legal Opinions - U.S. Supreme Court: June 30, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20080630/ai_n27885074]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. SUPREME COURT   Civil Procedure   Interpleader   BOTTOM LINE: Interpleaders did not lose standing to have a judgment vacated in its entirety on procedural grounds because they did not appeal, or petition for certiorari on the underlying ruling denying them the interpleaded assets.  ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/alien.html"><![CDATA[alien]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/commission.html"><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/iraq.html"><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/petition.html"><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/republic.html"><![CDATA[Republic]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sales.html"><![CDATA[SALES]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s..html"><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legal Opinions - U.S. Supreme Court: June 16, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20080616/ai_n26685716]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court   Civil Procedure   Recovery of paralegal fees   BOTTOM LINE: A prevailing party that satisfies the Equal Access to Justice Act's requirements may recover its paralegal fees from the Government at prevailing market rates.   CASE: Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/transportation.html"><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Law Digest]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20080616/ai_n26685718]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS   Professional Responsibility, Disbarment: Disbarment was the appropriate sanction for attorney who, while decertified for failure to pay Client Protection Fund assessments, continued to practice and committed serious violations of several rules of professional conduct. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Walker, Misc. AG No....]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/bankruptcy.html"><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/maryland.html"><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+circuit+court.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Modest Second Injury Fund bill passes Missouri House]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4181/is_20080514/ai_n25423595]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Missouri House took one last stab on Tuesday at reforming the state's Second Injury Fund.   In an 83-69 vote, House members approved a bill previously passed by the Senate that would fix a flaw in state statute that allows people receiving payments from the fund to continue...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+senate.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[A troubling trend in preemption rulings.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6658/is_200805/ai_n26578188]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Other cases may receive more headlines, but for trial lawyers, the  Supreme Court's most important decisions this year will focus on  preemption. And the Court is already displaying a troubling trend on  this issue.    On February 20, the Court handed down three decisions that...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fda.html"><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/healthcare.html"><![CDATA[HEALTHCARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/medtronic+inc..html"><![CDATA[Medtronic Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/ooa%252food%252foop.html"><![CDATA[OOA/OOD/OOP]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MDT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MDT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legal Opinions - Maryland Court of Appeals: April 28, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20080428/ai_n25370872]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Civil Procedure   Declaratory judgment actions   BOTTOM LINE: The trial judge erred in issuing an oral, not written, declaratory judgment, and the circuit court was directed to issue a declaratory judgment adopting the assessment of the Court of Special Appeals of the correct boundary between the parcels...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/board.html"><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/condominium.html"><![CDATA[condominium]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/council.html"><![CDATA[council]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/council.html"><![CDATA[Council]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/identity.html"><![CDATA[identity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/insurance.html"><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/judge.html"><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/legislature.html"><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/maryland.html"><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/state+farm+mutual+automobile+insurance+co..html"><![CDATA[State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/transcript.html"><![CDATA[transcript]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/witness.html"><![CDATA[witness]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Legal Opinions - Maryland Court of Appeals: April 7, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20080407/ai_n25142202]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial Law   Breach of warranty   BOTTOM LINE: In lawsuit alleging breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act and violation of Maryland's Consumer Protection Act, plaintiff failed to prove warranted item did not conform to warranty at time of sale.   ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/attorney.html"><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/defect.html"><![CDATA[defect]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/hyundai+motor+co..html"><![CDATA[Hyundai Motor Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/maryland.html"><![CDATA[Maryland]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/petition.html"><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">5380</category>
		<category domain="tickers">5380</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Federal and State Tax Records Retention]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5346/is_200804/ai_n25419397]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[How Long Is Long Enough?   Many taxpayers feel a sense of information-and paper-overload. E-mail, junk mail, regular mail, voicemail, faxes, text messages, and other communications make managing the information flow more difficult. When it comes to the records required to substantiate the information submitted on income tax returns,...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/income.html"><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/internal+revenue+service.html"><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/taxes.html"><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[NAA/NMHC working against homeownership incentives.(Political Insider: Capitol Beat)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6668/is_200804/ai_n26596649]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[AS THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS WORSENS, lawmakers are under pressure to  "do something." One proposal backed by the National  Association of Home Builders and others would create a new tax credit  for people who buy a new house or a house in default or foreclosure.  Legislation currently...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[FINANCE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/incentive.html"><![CDATA[incentive]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/quality.html"><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/regulations.html"><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/standards.html"><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/taxes.html"><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+senate.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[The Butterbaugh fallacy]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m6007/is_61/ai_n24960892]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I.    INTRODUCTION II.   BACKGROUND III.  THE USERRA ISSUE       A.  A Butterbaugh Appellant's Prima Facie USERRA Burden           1. The First Essential USERRA Question: Were Employee   ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/absence.html"><![CDATA[absence]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/absence.html"><![CDATA[Absence]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/agency.html"><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefit.html"><![CDATA[benefit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/board.html"><![CDATA[board]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/cir.html"><![CDATA[Cir]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/leave.html"><![CDATA[leave]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/marketing.html"><![CDATA[MARKETING]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sec.html"><![CDATA[Sec]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Should the Eighth Circuit recognize procedural misjoinder?]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m6528/is_1_53/ai_n25019603]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[I. INTRODUCTION  In the Eighth Circuit and elsewhere, traditional fraudulent joinder occurs when a plaintiff sues a diverse defendant in state court and joins a nondiverse defendant even though the plaintiff has no reasonable basis for a claim against the nondiverse defendant. (1) For example, consider a situation in...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 23:59:59 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/cir.html"><![CDATA[Cir]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/insurance.html"><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/litigation.html"><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/miller.html"><![CDATA[Miller]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Ledbetter in Congress: the limits of a narrow legislative override.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb350/is_200803/ai_n26468790]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[INTRODUCTION    In Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the Supreme Court  held that an employee was barred from suing her employer for pay  discrimination under Title VII. (1) The plaintiff, Lilly Ledbetter, was  a twenty-year employee of Goodyear who, over the course of...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/benefits.html"><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/discrimination.html"><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/goodyear+tire+%2526+rubber+co..html"><![CDATA[Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+congress.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">GT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">GT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Closing the courthouse doors to civil rights plaintiffs.]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6658/is_200803/ai_n26578079]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 9, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the consolidated  cases of Crawford v. Marion County Election Board and Indiana Democratic  Party v. Rotika on the question of whether an Indiana election law  requiring voters to show photo identification as a condition for voting  is...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/democratic+party.html"><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/government.html"><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/indiana.html"><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/software.html"><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[U.S. District Court Case Summaries: January 23, 2008]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4180/is_20080123/ai_n21208388]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court   Interest on Award   Date of Judgment   McEachin v. McGinnis   02-CV-6005CJSFe   Judge Siragusa   Issue: May the parties to a suit contract to alter the terms of 28 U.S.C. [section]1961 and agree to a rate of interest...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:59:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/statute.html"><![CDATA[statute]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+district+court.html"><![CDATA[U.S. District Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
