<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[sucker Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sucker.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to sucker]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="2" found="2" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Teamwork Is for Suckers, Become a Soloist]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.bnet.com/bnet1/?p=2109]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[  	The Find: A much buzzed about new book argues that teamwork is for suckers, and those who really want to get the most out of their careers should become "soloists."  	The Source: A post on Knowledge@Wharton about the aptly titled new book, I Hate People!: Kick Loose...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:49:33 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/teamwork.html"><![CDATA[Teamwork]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sucker.html"><![CDATA[Sucker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/worker.html"><![CDATA[Worker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/professional+development.html"><![CDATA[Professional Development]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/team+management.html"><![CDATA[Team Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/career.html"><![CDATA[Career]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/management.html"><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/jessica+stillman.html"><![CDATA[Jessica Stillman]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[There's a Sucker Born Every Second]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://blogs.bnet.com/salesmachine/?p=673]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[    Long-time readers are probably wondering why I haven't commented on the Madoff ponzi scheme.Â  I mean, you'd think that an alleged $50 billion fraud would get on my radar screen, if only as an example of over-enthusiastic selling.Â  Anyway, here's my two cents.   ...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:30:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sucker.html"><![CDATA[Sucker]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/financial.html"><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/ceo.html"><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/con.html"><![CDATA[Con]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/madoff.html"><![CDATA[Madoff]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/financial+accounting.html"><![CDATA[Financial Accounting]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/finance.html"><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/geoffrey+james.html"><![CDATA[Geoffrey James]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/geoffrey+james.html"><![CDATA[Geoffrey James]]></category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
