<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://resources.bnet.com/">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[summary judgment Resources | BNET]]></title>
	<link><![CDATA[http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html]]></link>
	<description><![CDATA[White papers, case studies, business articles, and blog posts relating to summary judgment]]></description>
	<s:counts start="0" returned="10" found="10" />
	<language>en-us</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[News America Marketing Group Wins Summary Judgment Against Whistleblower Robert Emmel]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://industry.bnet.com/advertising/10001239/news-america-marketing-group-wins-summary-judgment-against-whistleblower-robert-emmel/]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge has awarded a summary judgment to News America Marketing Group in its case against a former account director who alerted federal authorities to the company's alleged anticompetitive practices. by Jim Edwards]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Blog posts]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:35:48 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/wrongdoing.html"><![CDATA[Wrongdoing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/employee.html"><![CDATA[Employee]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/news+america.html"><![CDATA[News America]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/valassis.html"><![CDATA[Valassis]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/productivity.html"><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/marketing+research.html"><![CDATA[Marketing Research]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/corporate+law.html"><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/hacking.html"><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/security.html"><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/marketing.html"><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/business+operations.html"><![CDATA[Business Operations]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/jim+edwards.html"><![CDATA[Jim Edwards]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/jim+edwards.html"><![CDATA[Jim Edwards]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Ring Plus Files Summary Judgment Motion of Patent Infringement Against AT&T]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2008_Jan_5/ai_n27489312]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[LOS ANGELES -- On Monday the 24th of December, the day after Ring Plus filed its motion to disqualify AT&T attorneys from the law firm of Baker Botts, Ring Plus filed a Sealed Motion of Summary Judgment of Infringement asking the Court to make a ruling based on undisputed facts.]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/at%2526t+corp..html"><![CDATA[AT&T Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent+infringement.html"><![CDATA[Patent Infringement]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">T</category>
		<category domain="tickers">T</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Court Grants Depomed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Patent Infringement Against IVAX]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_Dec_13/ai_n27474039]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Court Rejects All Summary Judgment Motions From IVAX]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/ivax+corp..html"><![CDATA[IVAX Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">IVX</category>
		<category domain="tickers">IVX</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Home Diagnostics Wins Summary Judgment in Patent Infringement Case with Roche]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2007_March_5/ai_n27289070]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. -- Home Diagnostics, Inc. (Nasdaq:HDIX), a leading manufacturer and marketer of diabetes testing supplies, announced today that on March 2, 2007, the United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division granted a Summary Judgment ruling in favor of Home Diagnostics for non-infringement and denied the...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/roche+holding+ag.html"><![CDATA[Roche Holding AG]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Mangosoft Announces Court Decision]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2006_March_16/ai_n26797464]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[NASHUA, N.H. -- MANGOSOFT of Nashua, NH (OTC: BB: MGOF), a developer of Internet-enabling business software solutions, this morning announced that on March 14, 2006 the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire issued a decision on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment in the case...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/mangosoft.html"><![CDATA[Mangosoft]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/oracle+corp..html"><![CDATA[Oracle Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">MGOF</category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">ORCL</category>
		<category domain="tickers">MGOF,ORCL</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Dormant lawsuit may be revived; If successful, suit against 401(k) provider could open door.(News)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb4798/is_200408/ai_n17433806]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Byline: Brooke Southall       SAN FRANCISCO - Nationwide Financial Services Inc. is feeling new  heat from an old lawsuit because the political climate has changed under  its feet.       If this once-unlikely lawsuit is successful, it could set...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/401%2528k%2529+plan.html"><![CDATA[401(k) plan]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/lawsuit.html"><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/sec.html"><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Working mother wins gender bias ruling; Employer's questioning of ability to balance work and life found discriminatory.(News)(Circuit Court of Appeals )]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5252/is_200404/ai_n20156125]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Byline: JUDY GREENWALD    NEW YORK-An employer that questions a young mother's devotion  to her job can be found liable for gender discrimination, a federal  appellate court panel has ruled.    The decision by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel  Byline:...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/job.html"><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/u.s.+circuit+court.html"><![CDATA[U.S. Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/women.html"><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Active pharmaceutical ingredients watch. (Markets: Life Sciences).(Alpharma says New Jersey court grants summary judgment of noninfringement for two patents related to Pfizer Inc.'s $2 billion anticonvulsant drug Neurontin )(Brief Article)]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb4250/is_200306/ai_n13211482]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[ALPHARMA Inc. reports that a district court in New Jersey granted a  summary judgment of noninfringement for two patents listed in the  FDA's Orange Book relating to Pfizer Inc.'s $2 billion  anticonvulsant drug Neurontin gabapentin. In January, the    ALPHARMA Inc. reports that a district...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/fda.html"><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/life+science.html"><![CDATA[life science]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/patent.html"><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/pfizer+inc..html"><![CDATA[Pfizer Inc.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">PFE</category>
		<category domain="tickers">PFE</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[More than One Way to Skin a Patent Under DOE: Vitiation in Lieu of Estoppel. ]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go1494/is_200305/ai_n7521951]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[In a spring 2001 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a summary judgment of no doctrine of equivalents infringement of a Lockheed Martin satellite control patent by Space Systems/Loral SSL, in view of an amendment based e      In a spring...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/lockheed+martin+corp..html"><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin Corp.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">LMT</category>
		<category domain="tickers">LMT</category>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Lead paint suit reinstated on appeal]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4183/is_20020412/ai_n10050084]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Circumstantial evidence that a child developed lead poisoning while residing in a certain place is sufficient for a lead paint negligence lawsuit to survive summary judgment, the Court of Special Appeals has held.  The intermediate appellate court held that property management company L & R Properties Inc. should not...]]></description>
		<s:doctype><![CDATA[Research articles]]></s:doctype>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2002 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/summary+judgment.html"><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/the+dow+chemical+co..html"><![CDATA[The Dow Chemical Co.]]></category>
		<category domain="http://resources.bnet.com/topic/.html"><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category domain="http://rss.financialcontent.com/stocksymbol">DOW</category>
		<category domain="tickers">DOW</category>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
